Republican National Committee Chairman Michael Steel is again proving to be anything but a bold voice for the ousted party.

The Wall Street Journal reports that a number of RNC members are not happy with Steele’s term “collectivist” to describe Obama, instead of simply using the word socialist, which clearly strikes the kind of strident chord we need right now. at a time when clear differences between the parties need to be made, emphasized and repeated routinely.

As the run-up to the 2010 elections closes fast, Steele is simply not doing enough to define the clear differences between conservatives and liberals, and his choice of words in defining Obama obfuscates more than clarifies.

We need bold, clear messages!

Why not Sarah Palin? She has the star power to command attention whenever she speaks, has a core set of principles that are closer to Reagan’s than anyone else out there, draws enormous crowds wherever she goes, and most importantly, she doesn’t pull punches.

If conservatives are to regain the majority it must be through a clear messages with simple talking points. Sarah can get us back on track and inject the adrenilin we need as the 2012 election draws closer.

So what do you think? Wouldn’t you prefer a vibrant, attractive speaker to a wishy-washy, middle-of-the-road choice?

Also, by being the the Chairman of the GOP, Sarah could stay in the spotlilght in a manner that plays to her strenghts. 

Maybe she was a little rough around the edges during the last campaign, but Sarah is only going to get better and stronger.

She’s my pick for RNC Chairman!  More…